Tag Archives: dui case

Bellevue DUI Laws, DUI Advice, DUI Risk, DUI Tips, Seattle DUI Laws

So you subpoena the arresting officer to a DOL hrg and they show up, now what?

Leave a comment

The other day I was talking with a Seattle Police Officer about a recent DOL administrative hearing he did for a DUI arrest in Seattle that he made. He told me that he was served a subpoena to appear to the telephone hearing. So when the DOL called him he answered and appeared for the hearing. But when he was connected to the DUI Attorney, the Attorney didn’t ask a single question and instead told the DOL he didn’t have any questions for the Seattle Police Officer. Here is why that DUI Attorney was an idiot and completely wasted their clients time and money.

It’s no secret that if you get arrested for a DUI in Washington State then you’re most likely facing an administrative license suspension from the DOL. Unfortunately the odds are against a driver if they find themselves in one of these hearings. Statewide the average dismissal rate is around 25%. Here at Leyba Defense PLLC we have a dismissal rate closer to 38% due to how we approach these hearings. But I digress.

Because the DOL hearings following a DUI arrest are so dang hard to win often times a DUI Attorney will employ the hail mary if they have no other options. And that is to serve a subpoena on the arresting officer and hope they don’t appear. It’s a last line of defense and is often a strategy I hope for myself to be honest with you. But I have news for you. Most of the time these DUI police officers will appear. After all they get paid time and a half to do so. If you were a police officer wouldn’t you appear. I mean all they have to do is answer the telephone in their bed and answer some questions about their DUI arrest. It really is not that difficult for them.

So let’s say that you have a crappy DUI case. There are no legal issues. Everything appears to have been done properly by the DUI police officer during the DUI arrest. So you decide to subpoena the DUI officer to appear and pray that they don’t show up. But then the DUI police officer does, what do you do?

As a practicing DUI Lawyer in Seattle I will tell you what you don’t do. You don’t tell the DOL you excuse the DUI police officer and have no questions for them. That is a complete waste of time, and honestly is borderline malpractice. Although it doesn’t surprise me that DUI Lawyers do this. I mean after all this is a business where a lot of so called “DUI Lawyers” aren’t interested in fighting for their clients, but only collecting a pay check by doing as little work as possible. It doesn’t get any easier than not asking a single question at a DOL hearing and then telling the client there was nothing you could do since the DUI police officer appeared.

So what do you do if the DUI police officer shows up? You ask them questions. A DOL hearing is a free deposition of the police officer without the Prosecutor present. You can ask anything you want. You can find out what observations the officer made. How they administered the field sobriety tests. Whether they followed the proper protocol during the breath test. Ask away, and guess what it is all recorded. If the DUI police officer says something that is inconsistent with their police report, or you catch them in a lie it is all recorded and it can be used in the criminal trial.

I can’t tell you how many times I had a crappy DOL case. But I served a subpoena on the arresting officer. They showed up and I proceeded to find something out that I wouldn’t have known otherwise. I then used that in the criminal trial to either get the DUI dismissed or reduced. It happens quite often and the so called DUI Lawyers that just hang up when the Cop appears never get that benefit.

_
About the author: Matthew Leyba is a DUI lawyer in the Seattle Bellevue area of Western WA. He has been repeatedly named a Rising Star in the field of DUI Defense by the Seattle Met Magazine, an honor less than 2.5% of all Attorneys receive. Additionally he is rated as a 10/10 Superb DUI lawyer by Avvo.com

DUI Advice, DUI Risk, DUI Tips

How to get rid of that pesky ignition interlock device following your Seattle DUI arraignment

Leave a comment

Lately I have been seeing more and more people required to have an ignition interlock device following their DUI arraignment on a first offense DUI. Previously only the Judges in Seattle Municipal Court were imposing this ignition interlock device requirement following a DUI arrest. But more and more Judges around King County are following suit. I believe this is a complete misinterpretation of the law, and is quite frankly unconstitutional. However if you do find yourself in this boat of having an IID on a first offense DUI, don’t fret there may be a way to get rid of it.

Whenever I have a client facing this dreadful situation the first thing I have them do is get an alcohol and drug evaluation. The purpose of this evaluation is for a state certified chemical dependency counselor to find that you do not suffer alcohol abuse or dependence and because of that you’re not likely to drink and drive. Typically the recommended treatment on a DUI case for this type of evaluation is a one day class called an alcohol drug information school and victim impact panel class.

Once the results of the evaluation come in for the DUI arrest, I make my clients take both of those classes. I then file a motion in the court asking the Judge to reconsider the ignition interlock device that was imposed. For example lets say you have a DUI in Seattle Municipal Court. This is a place where the bulk of my practice is and it can be a little tricky if you’re not familiar with it. First you need to file what is called an add on motion. This is a motion where you request the case to be heard on a certain date. Secondly you then filed the motion to strike the ignition interlock device once that date is received.

The next thing is do is get the records for my clients ignition interlock device. It will say whether there have been any positive tests for alcohol and when they were. Ideally there are no positive tests and that also can be submitted to the DUI Judge in an effort to show the client has not consumed a drop of alcohol and then decided to drive.

Now once you’re in front of the Judge you need to make a pitch that the IID is unreasonable and a simple abstain condition will do the trick of keeping your client from drinking and driving. Obviously there is more to it than that but that is the gist of the argument. If you find yourself in this position and an IID was imposed at your arraignment feel free to contact my office and I can help you get it removed.

_
About the author: Matthew Leyba is a Bellevue Seattle DUI Attorney in Western, WA. He has been named a Rising Star by the Seattle Met Magazine in the field of DUI Defense, an honor less than 2.5% of all Attorneys receive. Additionally he is rated as a 10/10 and listed as a Superb Seattle DUI lawyer by Avvo.com

DUI Advice, DUI Risk, DUI Tips

Another below legal limit DUI convicted in Redmond

Leave a comment

Last summer I wrote about a DUI case (not mine) in Redmond King County District Court where the defendant was convicted of a DUI with a 0.04 alcohol level. The legal limit in Washington State is 0.08. Well another defendant was convicted of having a below legal limit DUI in Redmond. This time it was a 2 nanogram THC level. The legal limit in Washington State now that marijuana is legalized is 5 nanograms.

If you’re not familiar with the DUI laws here in Washington State you may wonder how is this even possible. How can someone who is significantly below the legal limit first of all be charged with a DUI and secondly be convicted of it. Well welcome to the post-2012 world we live in when it comes to DUI cases in King County. In my opinion as a DUI lawyer practicing in Seattle, WA there were three things that changed in 2012-2013 that answers my questions above.

First a major shift occurred in King County when it came to negotiating DUI cases. If you practice DUI defense at all in King County then you know what Im talking about. Long story short if you get charged with a DUI in King County the chances of getting the charge reduced is significantly more difficult than pre-2012.

Secondly in early 2013 there were several high provide vehicular homicide cases where the defendants were repeat DUI offenders in Seattle. The caused a major uproar in our State Government. Both the Governor and the State Legislature used these horrific tragedies as a spring board to drastically change and toughen our DUI laws in Washington.

Lastly because of the negative media those vehicular homicide cases caused, several State legislators used that as a rallying cry against all DUI cases. Regardless if it was a first offense below the legal limit DUI or a repeat offender who caused an accident they were all the same. And many people in the general public have started to become swayed by this uproar and guess what those are the people who fill the jury pools deciding DUI cases.

So when you take all that into consideration. The change in negotiating policy, the negative backlash that all DUIs have been getting, and the brain washed general public who think any DUI is illegal even one that is significantly less than the legal limit. It is a recipe for disaster and that is in my opinion as a DUI lawyer how someone can get convicted of DUI with a blood alcohol level or marijuana level below the legal limit.

_
About the author: Matthew Leyba is a DUI lawyer in Seattle, WA. He has repeatedly been named a Rising Star in the area of DUI Defense by both his peers and the Seattle Met Magazine, an honor less than 2.5% of all Lawyers receive. Additionally he is rated a 10/10 and listed as a Superb Seattle DUI lawyer by Avvo.com