Tag Archives: matthew leyba

DUI Advice, DUI Risk, DUI Tips

How to get rid of that pesky ignition interlock device following your Seattle DUI arraignment

Leave a comment

Lately I have been seeing more and more people required to have an ignition interlock device following their DUI arraignment on a first offense DUI. Previously only the Judges in Seattle Municipal Court were imposing this ignition interlock device requirement following a DUI arrest. But more and more Judges around King County are following suit. I believe this is a complete misinterpretation of the law, and is quite frankly unconstitutional. However if you do find yourself in this boat of having an IID on a first offense DUI, don’t fret there may be a way to get rid of it.

Whenever I have a client facing this dreadful situation the first thing I have them do is get an alcohol and drug evaluation. The purpose of this evaluation is for a state certified chemical dependency counselor to find that you do not suffer alcohol abuse or dependence and because of that you’re not likely to drink and drive. Typically the recommended treatment on a DUI case for this type of evaluation is a one day class called an alcohol drug information school and victim impact panel class.

Once the results of the evaluation come in for the DUI arrest, I make my clients take both of those classes. I then file a motion in the court asking the Judge to reconsider the ignition interlock device that was imposed. For example lets say you have a DUI in Seattle Municipal Court. This is a place where the bulk of my practice is and it can be a little tricky if you’re not familiar with it. First you need to file what is called an add on motion. This is a motion where you request the case to be heard on a certain date. Secondly you then filed the motion to strike the ignition interlock device once that date is received.

The next thing is do is get the records for my clients ignition interlock device. It will say whether there have been any positive tests for alcohol and when they were. Ideally there are no positive tests and that also can be submitted to the DUI Judge in an effort to show the client has not consumed a drop of alcohol and then decided to drive.

Now once you’re in front of the Judge you need to make a pitch that the IID is unreasonable and a simple abstain condition will do the trick of keeping your client from drinking and driving. Obviously there is more to it than that but that is the gist of the argument. If you find yourself in this position and an IID was imposed at your arraignment feel free to contact my office and I can help you get it removed.

_
About the author: Matthew Leyba is a Bellevue Seattle DUI Attorney in Western, WA. He has been named a Rising Star by the Seattle Met Magazine in the field of DUI Defense, an honor less than 2.5% of all Attorneys receive. Additionally he is rated as a 10/10 and listed as a Superb Seattle DUI lawyer by Avvo.com

DUI Advice, DUI Risk, DUI Tips

Another below legal limit DUI convicted in Redmond

Leave a comment

Last summer I wrote about a DUI case (not mine) in Redmond King County District Court where the defendant was convicted of a DUI with a 0.04 alcohol level. The legal limit in Washington State is 0.08. Well another defendant was convicted of having a below legal limit DUI in Redmond. This time it was a 2 nanogram THC level. The legal limit in Washington State now that marijuana is legalized is 5 nanograms.

If you’re not familiar with the DUI laws here in Washington State you may wonder how is this even possible. How can someone who is significantly below the legal limit first of all be charged with a DUI and secondly be convicted of it. Well welcome to the post-2012 world we live in when it comes to DUI cases in King County. In my opinion as a DUI lawyer practicing in Seattle, WA there were three things that changed in 2012-2013 that answers my questions above.

First a major shift occurred in King County when it came to negotiating DUI cases. If you practice DUI defense at all in King County then you know what Im talking about. Long story short if you get charged with a DUI in King County the chances of getting the charge reduced is significantly more difficult than pre-2012.

Secondly in early 2013 there were several high provide vehicular homicide cases where the defendants were repeat DUI offenders in Seattle. The caused a major uproar in our State Government. Both the Governor and the State Legislature used these horrific tragedies as a spring board to drastically change and toughen our DUI laws in Washington.

Lastly because of the negative media those vehicular homicide cases caused, several State legislators used that as a rallying cry against all DUI cases. Regardless if it was a first offense below the legal limit DUI or a repeat offender who caused an accident they were all the same. And many people in the general public have started to become swayed by this uproar and guess what those are the people who fill the jury pools deciding DUI cases.

So when you take all that into consideration. The change in negotiating policy, the negative backlash that all DUIs have been getting, and the brain washed general public who think any DUI is illegal even one that is significantly less than the legal limit. It is a recipe for disaster and that is in my opinion as a DUI lawyer how someone can get convicted of DUI with a blood alcohol level or marijuana level below the legal limit.

_
About the author: Matthew Leyba is a DUI lawyer in Seattle, WA. He has repeatedly been named a Rising Star in the area of DUI Defense by both his peers and the Seattle Met Magazine, an honor less than 2.5% of all Lawyers receive. Additionally he is rated a 10/10 and listed as a Superb Seattle DUI lawyer by Avvo.com

Seattle DUI Laws

CPS and DUI’s in Washington State

Leave a comment

If you have been arrested for a DUI and you had a child under 16 in your vehicle. Then you will be facing some increased penalties for the DUI. One of which is a possible investigation into the child’s well being by the division of child protective services. RCW 46.61.507 states the following

In every case where a person is arrested for a violation of RCW 46.61.502 or 46.61.504, the law enforcement officer shall make a clear notation if a child under the age of sixteen was present in the vehicle. A law enforcement officer shall promptly notify child protective services whenever a child is present in a vehicle being driven by his or her parent, guardian, legal custodian, or sibling or half-sibling and that person is being arrested for a drug or alcohol-related driving offense. This section does not require law enforcement to take custody of the child unless there is no other responsible person, or an agency having the right to physical custody of the child that can be contacted, or the officer has reasonable grounds to believe the child should be taken into custody pursuant to RCW 13.34.050 or 26.44.050. For purposes of this section, “child” means any person under sixteen years of age

So what exactly does this mean you ask. Imagine you went out to dinner with your family. You have a few beers and feel you’re perfectly fine to drive. After all you would never do anything to harm your family. Unfortunately you get stopped for committing a minor traffic infraction. The officer smells the odor of alcohol and places you under arrest for a DUI in Seattle and you get booked into custody.

The next day when you get out of jail there are a million things going through your mind. And you don’t even think as a result of your DUI arrest your kids could be taken from you. But according to RCW 46.61.507 that is a distinct and real possibility. And keep in mind even if charges were never filed, even if your DUI got dismissed or you were found not guilty at trial. CPS is still required to contact the individual arrested based simply on the DUI arrest. And the BS thing about this is if the officer was completely wrong and illegally placed you under arrest for DUI you will still face a visit from CPS. If you find yourself in this unenviable position it is always best to contact a DUI lawyer immediately to discuss what the safest course of action should be.

_
About the author: Matthew Leyba is the owner of Leyba Defense PLLC, a DUI law firm located in downtown Seattle. He has been nominated as a Rising Star in the area of DUI defense by the Seattle Met Magazine, an honor less than 2.5% of all Attorneys receive. Additionally he is rated as a Superb 10/10 Seattle DUI Lawyer by Avvo.com

Bellevue DUI Laws, DUI Tips, Seattle DUI Laws

Senate panel weighs new felony DUI bill in Washington State

Leave a comment

A Senate panel is weighing a measure that would make it a felony charge to drive under the influence when the driver has three prior offenses within 10 years. The Senate Law & Justice heard testimony on Senate Bill 6090 on Monday, and will likely take a vote on it in the coming days.

Under the existing law, a DUI is a felony only if there are four or more prior offenses within 10 years. Last year the idea was originally proposed but eventually was cut due to the estimated cost. However the same work group is at it again and Governor Inslee as well as some other higher ups have put their full weight behind it again.

I’m really torn about how I feel about this. As a Seattle DUI Attorney this is something that will directly affect my practice and my clients. Although 99% of my clients have no criminal history when they get arrested for a DUI in the King County area. So it’s not like the majority of people will feel the full brunt of this change if it were to occur.

However when you look at the difference in penalties from a gross misdemeanor to a felony this proposed change is kind of a big deal. Instead of 90 days in jail a defendant would be facing prison time in addition to all the collateral consequences that comes with a felony conviction.

I suspect if the budget is better this year than we will see this change. Despite the horrendous vehicular homicide and vehicular assault cases 2013 had. They didn’t seem to stop as the year went on. And it seems like every time you watch the news or read the paper another repeat DUI offender has gotten arrested in Seattle.

In fact I saw a tweet from the WSP that there were something like 16 people arrested for DUI in King County following the Seahawks game. Which was more than double what happened the past 2 weeks combined. The proponents of this bill will just continue to point to these numbers and DUI arrests in Seattle to support their position. And unfortunately for the opponents of this bill there is not a lot to say other than pointing out the cost and the increase in prison population for these nonviolent offenders.

_
About the author: Matthew Leyba is a DUI Lawyer in the Seattle Bellevue area of Western Washington. His has been rated a 10/10 Superb Seattle DUI Lawyer by Avvo.com. He was also nominated as a Rising Star by the Seattle Met Magazine in the field of DUI Defense, an honor less than 2.5% of all Attorneys receive.